Most financial models treat insurance as a line item:
But limits are not administrative inputs. They are capital decisions.
This model was built to answer a simple question: When a loss hits, where does the capital gap land?
A fully built 150 MW solar + 75 MW / 300 MWh BESS project, including:
Then one variable changes: Insurance limit: $25M vs. $50M. And the model stress tests:
The result is a cascading effect: lower limit → capital gap → liquidity stress → covenant compression → potential equity cure.
The math shows exactly where each decision lands.
At the 250-year return period, reserves absorb the shock.
At the 500-year return period, the sponsor faces an equity cure.
Where you draw the line is not an insurance decision. It’s a risk tolerance decision – which return period do you pick?
Earthquake was chosen deliberately.
The model isolates the structural relationship between insurance limits and cash flow durability.
Substitute your own risk.
The framework holds.
If you work in non-recourse renewable energy finance, this is built for you.
Start with the Insurance & PML tab.
That’s where limits become capital consequences.
If your current financial model doesn’t connect insurance limits to liquidity, DSCR, and equity cure, it’s incomplete.
Use this to determine if your current insurance program is built for premium savings or capital survival.
This model is for educational and illustrative purposes only. It does not constitute financial, legal, or insurance advice. All project parameters are hypothetical. Insurance premiums reprice annually; this model assumes static escalation for demonstration purposes. Consult qualified professionals for investment decisions.
Copyright © 2025 Clean Power Whisperer - All Rights Reserved.
Advisory & Education | AI • Energy • Climate